PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBAT vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBAT vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBAT vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
18.93%32.09%-13.19%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%42.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


IBAT

1D
3.41%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
18.93%
6M
21.28%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBAT vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBAT vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBAT
IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBAT vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBATIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

-0.40

+2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

-0.29

+3.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.97

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

-0.39

+5.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.36

-0.83

+13.19

IBAT vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBAT and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBATIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

-0.40

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.35

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between IBAT and IBIT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBAT vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
0.97%1.15%1.37%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBAT vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBATIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-49.36%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-49.36%

+36.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-46.11%

+38.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-14.13%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

23.09%

-18.19%

Volatility

IBAT vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is 10.76%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that IBAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBATIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

12.99%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

36.75%

-16.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.78%

45.42%

-19.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

51.26%

-28.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

51.26%

-28.41%