PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBAT vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBAT vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 64.52% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


IBAT

1D
-1.22%
1M
10.03%
YTD
64.52%
6M
57.93%
1Y
124.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBAT vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
64.52%32.09%-13.19%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IBAT and DBE is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBAT and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBAT vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBAT
IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBAT vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBATDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.40

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.21

5.89

+4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.91

11.53

+15.38

IBAT vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.75, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBAT and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBATDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75

2.43

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.09

+1.32

Drawdowns

IBAT vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBATDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-86.69%

+58.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-14.41%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-30.27%

+29.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-57.31%

+49.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

7.35%

-2.71%

Volatility

IBAT vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is 10.25%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that IBAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBATDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

12.95%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

30.86%

-10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.35%

34.97%

-8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

29.39%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

28.33%

-4.50%

IBAT vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBAT vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
0.70%1.15%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBAT and DBE have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to IBAT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBAT dropped -28.26% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, IBAT leads with 124.45% vs 84.41% for DBE. On fees, IBAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBAT has been the lower-risk option at 10.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBAT has performed better with a 124.45% return vs 84.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.70% for IBAT.

IBAT is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. IBAT tracks STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBAT and 0.78% for DBE.

IBAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.75 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBAT and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer