PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBALX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBALX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IBALX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 9.65%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


IBALX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.02%
YTD
5.77%
6M
5.87%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.65%

TIBIX

1D
0.65%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.96%
6M
21.37%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
26.83%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBALX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund
5.77%12.69%14.53%18.44%-16.48%16.65%15.55%21.33%-3.99%13.84%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.96%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IBALX and TIBIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2003

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between IBALX and TIBIX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBALX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBALX
IBALX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBALXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

4.77

-2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

6.85

-3.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.96

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

7.48

-4.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

29.20

-16.02

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBALX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBALXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

4.77

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.48

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.95

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.77

+0.01

Drawdowns

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBALX drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBALX and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBALXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-48.88%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-5.39%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-9.23%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.64%

-20.79%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.64%

-34.85%

+11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-5.96%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.38%

-0.04%

Volatility

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) is 2.07%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that IBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBALXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

3.12%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

6.99%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.59%

8.46%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.45%

11.16%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

13.50%

-2.00%

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBALX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBALX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

IBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than TIBIX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBALX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund
5.81%6.13%7.92%4.09%3.09%6.82%4.84%4.15%8.16%3.20%1.49%3.44%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.03%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBALX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to IBALX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBALX dropped -43.33% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBALX and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer