PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IB01.L vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -24.21% return.


IB01.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*

PLTR

1D
5.25%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-24.21%
6M
-26.49%
1Y
-1.96%
3Y*
102.18%
5Y*
40.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.56%4.34%5.25%4.92%1.08%-0.85%0.01%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-24.21%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IB01.L and PLTR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IB01.L vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IB01.LPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+36.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

7.99

1.04

+6.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

114.79

-0.05

+114.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

574.12

-0.09

+574.22

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IB01.L Sharpe Ratio is 11.91, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IB01.L and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IB01.LPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-84.62%

+83.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-38.22%

+38.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.09%

-40.61%

+40.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.15%

-79.14%

+77.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-34.98%

+34.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-40.27%

+40.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

21.35%

-21.34%

Volatility

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.09%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.72%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IB01.LPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

17.72%

-17.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

38.70%

-38.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

51.17%

-50.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

65.49%

-64.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.79%

69.76%

-68.97%

Dividends

IB01.L vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IB01.L nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IB01.L and PLTR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IB01.L and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer