IB01.L vs. IBTU.L
IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IBTU.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IB01.L returned 3.39%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for IBTU.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IB01.L having a 1.45% return and IBTU.L slightly lower at 1.39%.
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTU.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.45% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 2.01% |
IBTU.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.39% | 4.36% | 5.23% | 4.96% | 1.09% | -0.01% | 0.96% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB01.L and IBTU.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | 0.33 |
The correlation between IB01.L and IBTU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IB01.L
IBTU.L
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IB01.L | IBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 8.02 | 3.95 | +4.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 115.45 | 24.79 | +90.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 569.86 | 183.92 | +385.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IB01.L | IBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94 | 8.12 | +3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 9.24 | 6.79 | +2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.79 | 5.05 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -0.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and IBTU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB01.L | IBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -0.62% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -0.16% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.09% | -0.16% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.29% | -0.29% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.03% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.02% | -0.01% |
Volatility
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) has a higher volatility of 0.10% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that IB01.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB01.L | IBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.08% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.24% | 0.31% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 0.49% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 0.50% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.72% | 0.54% | +0.18% |
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IB01.L and IBTU.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IB01.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison
IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTU.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.07% | 4.43% | 6.82% | 3.99% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 1.28% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IB01.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L and IBTU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
Both ETFs track ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.
Find the right allocation for IB01.L and IBTU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer