IAUM vs. YGLD
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and YGLD (Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF) are both Gold funds. IAUM is passively managed, while YGLD is actively managed. Over the past year, IAUM returned 32.42% vs 23.02% for YGLD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IAUM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for YGLD.
Performance
IAUM vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's -7.24% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGLD
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 3.00% | 64.27% | -0.72% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -7.24% | 96.82% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and YGLD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IAUM and YGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IAUM vs. YGLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAUM
YGLD
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IAUM
YGLD
-
Basic Materials
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Communication Services
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Consumer Defensive
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Energy
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Financial Services
IAUM
-
YGLD
Healthcare
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Industrials
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Technology
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Utilities
IAUM
-
YGLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
YGLD
IAUM vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAUM | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.14 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 0.68 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 1.55 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAUM | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.57 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum YGLD drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and YGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -34.23% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.15% | -34.23% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.68% | -33.06% | +15.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -7.91% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 14.86% | -7.16% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 5.50%, while Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 8.70% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.89% | 34.68% | -11.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.31% | 40.43% | -14.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 39.10% | -21.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 39.10% | -21.24% |
IAUM vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUM vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison
IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 19.23% | 12.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IAUM and YGLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
YGLD has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to IAUM (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -20.87% vs YGLD's -34.23%.
On 1-year performance, IAUM leads with 32.42% vs 23.02% for YGLD. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 32.42% return vs 23.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for YGLD.
YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.23%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.50% for YGLD.
IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and YGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer