PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUM vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUM vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 5.40% return.


IAUM

1D
4.11%
1M
1.98%
6M
-14.07%
YTD
-1.56%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.74%

YCS

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.94%
6M
4.42%
YTD
5.40%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
13.35%
ALL TIME*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$93.38M$76.09M$95.11M
$2.59M$2.15M$1.60M

IAUM vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-1.56%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
5.40%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUM and YCS is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

-0.38

The correlation between IAUM and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (all time) to -0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUM vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAUM vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.69

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

9.73

-7.66

IAUM vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUM and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUM vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-49.56%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.31%

-8.48%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-23.05%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-27.32%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.32%

-7.34%

-13.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-19.75%

+13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.41%

2.34%

+10.07%

Volatility

IAUM vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 5.95%. This indicates that IAUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

5.95%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

11.87%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.03%

16.43%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

21.21%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.61%

-0.35%

IAUM vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUM vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAUM nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUM and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAUM has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to YCS (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -26.31% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 22.89% vs 19.18% for IAUM. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 22.89% return vs 19.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YCS.

IAUM and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

IAUM is categorized as Gold, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while YCS tracks JPY/USD 4:00 p.m. ET Cross Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.95% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUM and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer