PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUM vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -6.07% return, which is significantly higher than SGDJ's -9.52% return.


IAUM

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.66%
6M
-12.99%
YTD
-6.07%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
27.70%
5Y*
17.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.68%

SGDJ

1D
4.19%
1M
-2.98%
6M
-18.78%
YTD
-9.52%
1Y
70.50%
3Y*
47.29%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.21M$72.37M$93.87M
$3.49M$3.45M$5.08M

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-6.07%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-9.52%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUM and SGDJ is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.77

The correlation between IAUM and SGDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUM vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.87

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

3.88

-2.19

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUM and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-59.27%

+32.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.31%

-37.98%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-37.98%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-52.66%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.93%

-34.03%

+9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-26.34%

+20.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.24%

18.22%

-5.98%

Volatility

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 5.94%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

13.95%

-8.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.83%

40.00%

-19.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

52.51%

-24.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

41.32%

-22.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

40.93%

-22.75%

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUM vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
9.25%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUM and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to IAUM (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -26.31% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, IAUM leads with 17.38% vs 16.55% for SGDJ. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.25%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.

IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUM and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer