IAUM vs. IWM
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IAUM returned 28.82%/yr vs 19.22%/yr for IWM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAUM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IAUM vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.47% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -8.59%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
IAUM vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -4.68% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 3.87% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 20.47% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | -2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and IWM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between IAUM and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
IWM
IAUM vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUM | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.73 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 13.18 | -10.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -59.05% | +34.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.37% | -11.03% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.37% | -27.50% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.81% | -0.96% | -22.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -10.75% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 3.11% | +5.95% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.56%. This indicates that IAUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 6.56% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 14.31% | +9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.27% | 19.74% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 22.61% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 23.06% | -4.96% |
IAUM vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAUM vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and IWM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUM has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to IWM (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -24.37% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 3-year performance, IAUM leads with 28.82% vs 19.22% for IWM. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 28.82% return vs 19.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
IAUM is categorized as Gold, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer