PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUM vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUM vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 21.25% return.


IAUM

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.27%
6M
-16.73%
YTD
-6.09%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.70%

DXJ

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.20%
6M
14.45%
YTD
21.25%
1Y
46.99%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
27.38%
10Y*
19.00%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$66.09M$60.67M$58.46M
$77.48M$77.88M$93.44M

IAUM vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-6.09%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
21.25%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUM and DXJ is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.06

Over the past year, IAUM and DXJ have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUM vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAUM vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

4.30

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

16.08

-14.17

IAUM vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUM and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUM vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-49.63%

+23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.31%

-10.98%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-22.19%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-22.19%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.95%

-3.40%

-21.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-14.24%

+8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.14%

2.93%

+9.21%

Volatility

IAUM vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

6.07%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

14.35%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.81%

18.07%

+9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

19.07%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

19.93%

-1.74%

IAUM vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUM vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.97%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUM and DXJ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAUM has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to DXJ (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -26.31% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 5-year performance, DXJ leads with 27.38% vs 17.35% for IAUM. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 27.38% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.

IAUM is categorized as Gold, while DXJ is Japan Equities. IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUM and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer