IAUI vs. ACYS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IAUI charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

IAUI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IAUI

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: -13.50%
• YTD: -6.62%
• 1Y: 11.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.39%

ACYS

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	$8.22M	$7.08M	$6.02M
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	$8.84M	$8.74M	$10.60M

IAUI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	-12.65%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and ACYS is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

IAUI vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAUI

IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 24
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAUI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IAUI	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.39	—	—

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAUI	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-0.78%	-21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.80%	-0.15%	-20.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-0.17%	-5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IAUI	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.14%	3.76%	+18.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.99%	3.76%	+17.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.99%	3.76%	+17.23%

IAUI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAUI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.96%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	13.96%	6.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IAUI and ACYS in my portfolio?

IAUI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IAUI or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IAUI or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IAUI or ACYS?

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.96%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between IAUI and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.75% for ACYS.