PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 12.97%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


IAU

1D
-3.63%
1M
-8.61%
YTD
0.06%
6M
2.63%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
29.73%
5Y*
17.65%
10Y*
12.97%

TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.06%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and TQQQ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.04

The correlation between IAU and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IAU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAU
TQQQ

Real Estate

100.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Real Estate

IAU
100.0%
TQQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

IAU

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

IAU

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IAU

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

IAU

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

IAU

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

IAU

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

IAU

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

IAU

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

IAU

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

IAU

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAUTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.83

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

9.20

-5.60

IAU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.10

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.36

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.65

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.71

-0.10

Drawdowns

IAU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-81.66%

+36.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.04%

-36.97%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-58.04%

+38.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-81.66%

+60.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.82%

-81.66%

+59.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.04%

-16.25%

-3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-18.52%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

11.33%

-3.44%

Volatility

IAU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is 5.64%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that IAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

20.42%

-14.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

39.33%

-16.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.67%

49.81%

-23.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

66.79%

-48.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

66.11%

-50.17%

IAU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to IAU (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 12.97% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer