PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
10.48%63.95%29.03%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.18%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.18% return.


IAU

1D
1.72%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.05%
1Y
52.36%
3Y*
33.88%
5Y*
22.19%
10Y*
14.27%

IBIT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-42.10%
1Y
-20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAU and IBIT have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAUIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

-0.44

+2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

-0.37

+2.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.96

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

-0.35

+3.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.95

-0.75

+10.70

IAU vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

-0.44

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.36

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and IBIT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IAU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-49.36%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.18%

-49.36%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.71%

-45.80%

+34.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-14.18%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

23.27%

-18.04%

Volatility

IAU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is 10.44%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that IAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IAUIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

12.95%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.15%

36.76%

-12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.64%

45.40%

-17.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

51.21%

-33.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

51.21%

-35.38%