IAU vs. ETN
IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IAU returned 12.31%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for ETN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IAU vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 12.31%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.38% annualized return.
IAU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
ETN
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 23.65%
- 10Y*
- 23.38%
IAU vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -2.44% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 23.61% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAU and ETN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005 | 0.05 |
The correlation between IAU and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (10 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAU vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
IAU
ETN
IAU vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAU | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 2.25 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAU vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAU | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -68.95% | +23.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.40% | -19.14% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -34.46% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.40% | -34.46% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.40% | -44.55% | +20.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -9.36% | -12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -14.89% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 8.86% | -0.39% |
Volatility
IAU vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is 7.70%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that IAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAU | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 13.57% | -5.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.94% | 26.78% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.17% | 33.48% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 30.24% | -12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 30.10% | -14.08% |
Dividends
IAU vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.09% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAU and ETN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs ETN's -68.95%.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAU and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer