IAU vs. AUAU
IAU (iShares Gold Trust) and AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds - IAU tracks the LBMA Gold Price while AUAU tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IAU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AUAU.
Performance
IAU vs. AUAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than AUAU's 0.16% return.
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
AUAU
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU vs. AUAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 1.88% |
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.16% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAU and AUAU is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAU vs. AUAU — Risk / Return Rank
IAU
AUAU
IAU vs. AUAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAU | AUAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAU | AUAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.19 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
IAU vs. AUAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than AUAU's maximum drawdown of -30.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and AUAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAU | AUAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -30.38% | -14.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.70% | -26.02% | +8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -12.64% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | — | — |
Volatility
IAU vs. AUAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAU | AUAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.42% | 50.87% | -24.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 50.87% | -32.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 50.87% | -34.97% |
IAU vs. AUAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AUAU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAU vs. AUAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAU nor AUAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IAU and AUAU have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AUAU.
IAU and AUAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.35% for AUAU.
Find the right allocation for IAU and AUAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer