PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAT vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAT vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.51% return.


IAT

1D
-1.71%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
2.80%
6M
7.09%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
7.95%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAT vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
2.80%13.05%24.36%-8.53%-20.61%38.89%33.72%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.51%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IAT and SGOV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAT vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAT
IAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAT vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IATSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-274.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

195.55

-194.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

398.20

-396.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

4,462.00

-4,458.62

IAT vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAT and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IATSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

20.28

-19.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

14.73

-14.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

12.48

-12.39

Drawdowns

IAT vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IATSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.22%

-0.03%

-77.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-0.01%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-0.01%

-29.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.55%

-0.03%

-55.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

0.00%

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.97%

-0.00%

-26.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

0.00%

+6.81%

Volatility

IAT vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that IAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IATSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

0.05%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

0.13%

+15.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

0.20%

+21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.03%

0.24%

+28.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

0.24%

+30.54%

IAT vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAT vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
2.88%2.94%2.95%3.56%3.12%1.88%2.87%2.49%2.48%1.55%1.52%1.78%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAT and SGOV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAT has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.54% vs 1.35% for IAT. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.54% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IAT.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.88% for IAT.

IAT is categorized as Financials Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. IAT tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAT and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer