IAT vs. FBDC
IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. IAT is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAT charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
IAT vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -10.74% return.
IAT
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 12.53%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
FBDC
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAT vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 12.53% | 13.70% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -10.74% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and FBDC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
FBDC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IAT vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAT vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -20.60% | -56.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -18.37% | +17.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.91% | -10.47% | -16.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | — | — |
Volatility
IAT vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 17.96% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 17.96% | +11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 17.96% | +12.77% |
IAT vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAT vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than FBDC's 11.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.68% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.64% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAT and FBDC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.68%, compared with 2.64% for IAT.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for IAT and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer