IAT vs. FBDC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC).

IAT and FBDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. FBDC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 30, 2025.

Performance

IAT vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAT vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	-1.89%	13.31%
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-9.87%	-2.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.87% return.

IAT

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -3.69%
• YTD: -1.89%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 19.12%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

FBDC

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: -9.87%
• 6M: -9.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAT vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 13.69% expense ratio.

FBDC

FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF

IAT

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF

Return for Risk

IAT vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAT

IAT Risk / Return Rank: 41
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAT vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IAT	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.13	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAT	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	-0.91	+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between IAT and FBDC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IAT vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than FBDC's 9.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	3.01%	2.94%	2.95%	3.56%	3.12%	1.88%	2.87%	2.49%	2.48%	1.55%	1.52%	1.78%
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	9.28%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IAT vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and FBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAT	FBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.22%	-20.60%	-56.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.87%	-17.57%	+3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.14%	-9.11%	-18.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IAT	FBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.33%	17.36%	+9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.09%	17.36%	+11.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.80%	17.36%	+13.44%