IAT vs. AVUV
IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAT is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. IAT is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAT returned 1.35%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IAT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
IAT vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
IAT
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IAT vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.80% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 38.89% | -7.60% | 10.70% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and AVUV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IAT and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IAT vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAT
AVUV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IAT
AVUV
Basic Materials
IAT
-
AVUV
Communication Services
IAT
-
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
IAT
-
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
IAT
-
AVUV
Energy
IAT
-
AVUV
Healthcare
IAT
-
AVUV
Industrials
IAT
-
AVUV
Real Estate
IAT
-
AVUV
Technology
IAT
-
AVUV
Utilities
IAT
-
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
AVUV
IAT vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAT | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.61 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 13.69 | -10.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAT | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.10 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.47 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.56 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
IAT vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -49.42% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -7.95% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -28.79% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -28.79% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -1.12% | -8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.97% | -7.95% | -19.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 2.67% | +4.14% |
Volatility
IAT vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that IAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.08% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 11.34% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 17.54% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.03% | 22.74% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 28.30% | +2.48% |
IAT vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAT vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.88% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAT and AVUV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAT has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 1.35% for IAT. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IAT.
IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.
IAT is categorized as Financials Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAT and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer