IAT vs. ARKX
IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAT is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while ARKX is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by ARK. IAT is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAT returned 1.35%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for ARKX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
IAT vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than ARKX's 23.67% return.
IAT
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
ARKX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 6M
- 28.83%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 36.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
IAT vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.80% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 9.65% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 23.67% | 48.46% | 26.67% | 24.37% | -34.27% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and ARKX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IAT and ARKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IAT vs. ARKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAT
ARKX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAT
ARKX
-
Basic Materials
IAT
-
ARKX
Communication Services
IAT
-
ARKX
Consumer Cyclical
IAT
-
ARKX
Consumer Defensive
IAT
-
ARKX
-
Energy
IAT
-
ARKX
-
Healthcare
IAT
-
ARKX
Industrials
IAT
-
ARKX
Real Estate
IAT
-
ARKX
-
Technology
IAT
-
ARKX
Utilities
IAT
-
ARKX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
ARKX
IAT vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAT | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 3.42 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 9.20 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAT | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.15 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.42 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.43 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IAT vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than ARKX's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -43.61% | -33.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -20.42% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -25.47% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -43.61% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -5.03% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.97% | -19.99% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 7.57% | -0.76% |
Volatility
IAT vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) is 6.12%, while ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that IAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 11.01% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 25.01% | -9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 32.49% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.03% | 27.72% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 27.42% | +3.36% |
IAT vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAT vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while ARKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.88% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAT and ARKX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKX has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to IAT (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs ARKX's -43.61%.
On 5-year performance, ARKX leads with 11.53% vs 1.35% for IAT. On fees, IAT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ARKX has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.00% for ARKX.
IAT is categorized as Financials Equities, while ARKX is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.75% for ARKX.
ARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAT and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer