IASP.L vs. EPRA.L
IASP.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) are both REIT funds - IASP.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD while EPRA.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IASP.L returned -4.60%/yr vs 2.03%/yr for EPRA.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IASP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EPRA.L.
Performance
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly lower than EPRA.L's 6.79% return.
IASP.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- -7.66%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- -2.88%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- -0.92%
EPRA.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -7.66% | 17.20% | -11.78% | -10.90% | -4.90% | 2.59% | -14.59% | 8.99% | 0.23% | 2.34% |
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 6.79% | 3.12% | 1.31% | 4.40% | -16.02% | 27.84% | -11.99% | 17.30% | -0.56% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IASP.L and EPRA.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between IASP.L and EPRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IASP.L
EPRA.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
IASP.L
EPRA.L
Basic Materials
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Communication Services
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Consumer Defensive
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Energy
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Financial Services
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Healthcare
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Industrials
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Technology
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Utilities
IASP.L
-
EPRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASP.L
EPRA.L
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASP.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.42 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 5.00 | -4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASP.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.21 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.15 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.19 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, which is greater than EPRA.L's maximum drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and EPRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASP.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.81% | -35.65% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -8.95% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -17.01% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.75% | -26.59% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.67% | -3.51% | -32.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -9.83% | -9.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 2.55% | +2.14% |
Volatility
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) at 3.19%. This indicates that IASP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IASP.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 3.19% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 8.50% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 10.52% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 13.74% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 15.50% | -0.98% |
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRA.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IASP.L vs. EPRA.L - Dividend Comparison
IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IASP.L and EPRA.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.
IASP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD, while EPRA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IASP.L and 0.10% for EPRA.L.
Find the right allocation for IASP.L and EPRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer