EPRA.L vs. TRET.AS

In the year-to-date period, EPRA.L achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.AS's -4.00% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EPRA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TRET.AS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRA.L and TRET.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.

The maximum EPRA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum TRET.AS drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRA.L and TRET.AS.

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) is 4.00%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that EPRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.