PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IASP.L vs. 1530.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and 3SBio Inc (1530.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IASP.L is traded in GBp, while 1530.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1530.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly higher than 1530.HK's -34.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L has underperformed 1530.HK with an annualized return of -0.92%, while 1530.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


IASP.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
-7.66%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
-2.88%
5Y*
-4.60%
10Y*
-0.92%

1530.HK

1D
-2.25%
1M
-27.63%
YTD
-34.05%
6M
-46.93%
1Y
-17.04%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
-7.66%17.20%-11.78%-10.90%-4.90%2.59%-14.59%8.99%0.23%4.41%
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
-34.05%271.70%-14.04%-12.76%47.03%-7.71%-31.72%-2.72%-30.56%84.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IASP.L and 1530.HK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015

0.18

The correlation between IASP.L and 1530.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IASP.L
IASP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IASP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IASP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IASP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IASP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IASP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

1530.HK
1530.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
1530.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1530.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
1530.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
1530.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
1530.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and 3SBio Inc (1530.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IASP.L1530.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.01

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

-0.31

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.66

+1.39

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IASP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the 1530.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IASP.L and 1530.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IASP.L1530.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.27

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.27

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.21

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.15

-0.10

Drawdowns

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, smaller than the maximum 1530.HK drawdown of -78.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and 1530.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IASP.L1530.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.81%

-78.12%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-55.37%

+41.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.10%

-55.37%

+37.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

-58.29%

+27.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-78.12%

+36.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.67%

-55.37%

+19.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-42.12%

+22.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

26.08%

-21.39%

Volatility

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) is 3.79%, while 3SBio Inc (1530.HK) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that IASP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1530.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IASP.L1530.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

16.89%

-13.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

40.98%

-32.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

65.48%

-53.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.82%

54.39%

-42.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

50.37%

-35.85%

Dividends

IASP.L vs. 1530.HK - Dividend Comparison

IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than 1530.HK's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
1.56%1.03%4.11%1.33%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IASP.L and 1530.HK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IASP.L and 1530.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer