PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1530.HK vs. AAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in 3SBio Inc (1530.HK) and Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1530.HK is traded in HKD, while AAS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AAS.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1530.HK achieves a -33.91% return, which is significantly lower than AAS.L's 21.73% return. Over the past 10 years, 1530.HK has underperformed AAS.L with an annualized return of 9.39%, while AAS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.


1530.HK

1D
-2.32%
1M
-28.34%
YTD
-33.91%
6M
-46.23%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
29.30%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
9.39%

AAS.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
21.73%
6M
24.31%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
25.29%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
-33.91%300.89%-15.95%-8.19%31.63%-8.06%-30.00%0.60%-34.29%103.18%
AAS.L
Abrdn Asia Focus plc
21.73%36.56%10.06%11.56%-19.54%27.58%13.50%11.85%-7.80%24.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 1530.HK and AAS.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1530.HK vs. AAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1530.HK
1530.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
1530.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1530.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
1530.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
1530.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
1530.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AAS.L
AAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3SBio Inc (1530.HK) and Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1530.HKAAS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.39

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

3.07

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

10.63

-11.32

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1530.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1530.HK and AAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1530.HKAAS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

2.18

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.61

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.58

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.40

-0.27

Drawdowns

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1530.HK drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, which is greater than AAS.L's maximum drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1530.HK and AAS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1530.HKAAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.63%

-58.52%

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.49%

-14.25%

-41.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.49%

-15.22%

-40.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.61%

-35.63%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.63%

-43.16%

-35.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.49%

-5.40%

-50.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.10%

-14.76%

-29.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.27%

4.12%

+22.15%

Volatility

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Volatility Comparison

3SBio Inc (1530.HK) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) at 6.70%. This indicates that 1530.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1530.HKAAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

6.70%

+9.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.79%

17.03%

+23.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.36%

20.02%

+45.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.56%

21.35%

+33.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.30%

20.90%

+29.40%

Dividends

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Dividend Comparison

1530.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than AAS.L's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
1.56%1.03%4.11%1.33%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAS.L
Abrdn Asia Focus plc
1.47%1.77%1.98%2.65%4.34%0.00%1.63%1.77%1.68%1.52%1.11%2.04%

Financials

1530.HK vs. AAS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3SBio Inc and Abrdn Asia Focus plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 1530.HK values in HKD, AAS.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


1530.HK and AAS.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1530.HK and AAS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer