PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS

Last updated Jul 22, 2026
Documentation

IAPD.AS (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF) and FXC.AS (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAPD.AS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while FXC.AS is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. IAPD.AS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXC.AS.

Performance

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IAPD.AS) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

IAPD.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
—
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

FXC.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
6.21%
6M
-6.80%
YTD
-4.82%
1Y
-3.93%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
1.99%
ALL TIME*
-1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
IAPD.AS
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF		0.00%
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF		1.89%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

Often compared with IAPD.AS:
IAPD.AS vs. IUSA.LIAPD.AS vs. VPLIAPD.AS vs. EXSH.DEIAPD.AS vs. SPYGIAPD.AS vs. SPYDIAPD.AS vs. CPXJ.ASIAPD.AS vs. HDEM.L
Often compared with FXC.AS:
FXC.AS vs. AMDWXFXC.AS vs. HMCD.LFXC.AS vs. MCHIFXC.AS vs. EMIM.LFXC.AS vs. IWDA.LFXC.AS vs. IWDA.ASFXC.AS vs. CQQQ

Return for Risk

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IAPD.AS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FXC.AS
FXC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IAPD.AS) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IAPD.ASFXC.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

-0.21

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

-0.17

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

0.98

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

-0.19

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

-0.42

—

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAPD.AS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FXC.AS drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPD.AS and FXC.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IAPD.ASFXC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-68.25%

+68.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-20.97%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-27.79%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-43.51%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-53.92%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-26.90%

+26.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-37.57%

+37.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

9.28%

—

Volatility

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IAPD.ASFXC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

7.17%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

13.70%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

18.88%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

28.30%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

25.10%

—

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAPD.AS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXC.AS's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAPD.AS vs. FXC.AS - Dividend Comparison

IAPD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXC.AS
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF		1.75%1.79%2.26%2.51%2.52%1.79%2.49%2.47%2.99%2.39%2.34%2.62%
IAPD.AS
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, IAPD.AS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAPD.AS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXC.AS.

IAPD.AS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FXC.AS is China Equities. IAPD.AS tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while FXC.AS tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IAPD.AS and 0.74% for FXC.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAPD.AS and FXC.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer