IALAX vs. TBLRX
IALAX (Transamerica Capital Growth Fund) and TBLRX (Transamerica Balanced II) are both mutual funds - IALAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Transamerica, while TBLRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Transamerica. Over the past 5 years, IALAX returned -1.60%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for TBLRX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IALAX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TBLRX.
Performance
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IALAX achieves a -3.04% return, which is significantly lower than TBLRX's 5.31% return.
IALAX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- -1.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
TBLRX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | -3.04% | 20.54% | 43.92% | 47.30% | -60.39% | 0.10% | 111.63% | 21.63% | -7.01% |
TBLRX Transamerica Balanced II | 5.31% | 12.78% | 14.47% | 18.18% | -16.46% | 16.57% | 15.11% | 21.34% | -2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IALAX and TBLRX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IALAX and TBLRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IALAX vs. TBLRX — Risk / Return Rank
IALAX
TBLRX
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) and Transamerica Balanced II (TBLRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IALAX | TBLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 2.12 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 9.22 | -9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IALAX drawdown since its inception was -69.30%, which is greater than TBLRX's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IALAX and TBLRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IALAX | TBLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.30% | -25.35% | -43.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.07% | -6.11% | -22.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.33% | -19.88% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.30% | -25.35% | -43.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -0.31% | -20.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -6.00% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 1.40% | +13.37% |
Volatility
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Transamerica Balanced II (TBLRX) at 2.34%. This indicates that IALAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IALAX | TBLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 2.34% | +6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.89% | 6.44% | +17.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.05% | 8.00% | +22.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.93% | 14.19% | +27.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 13.87% | +20.98% |
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IALAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLRX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IALAX vs. TBLRX - Dividend Comparison
IALAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.49% | 5.37% | 10.49% | 4.92% | 23.22% | 22.63% | 3.34% |
TBLRX Transamerica Balanced II | 29.27% | 30.86% | 14.76% | 3.31% | 5.67% | 9.15% | 4.58% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IALAX and TBLRX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IALAX has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to TBLRX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IALAX dropped -69.30% vs TBLRX's -25.35%.
TBLRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IALAX and TBLRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer