IALAX vs. FSCSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) and Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX).
IALAX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Mar 1, 1999. FSCSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.
Performance
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | -18.81% | 20.54% | 43.92% | 47.30% | -60.39% | 0.10% | 111.63% | 21.63% | 6.59% | 43.81% |
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | -27.86% | 6.96% | 19.66% | 51.72% | -29.13% | 18.13% | 45.55% | 38.99% | 4.08% | 38.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IALAX achieves a -18.81% return, which is significantly higher than FSCSX's -27.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IALAX has underperformed FSCSX with an annualized return of 12.67%, while FSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.
IALAX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- -18.81%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- 9.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- -3.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
FSCSX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -27.86%
- 6M
- -29.20%
- 1Y
- -12.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IALAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCSX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IALAX vs. FSCSX — Risk / Return Rank
IALAX
FSCSX
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) and Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IALAX | FSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | -0.46 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | -0.48 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.94 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.48 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.33 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IALAX | FSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | -0.46 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.12 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between IALAX and FSCSX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Dividend Comparison
IALAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.35%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.49% | 5.37% | 10.49% | 4.92% | 23.22% | 22.63% | 3.34% |
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | 21.35% | 15.40% | 19.17% | 7.72% | 9.06% | 6.54% | 5.10% | 12.70% | 6.20% | 7.15% | 3.98% | 5.22% |
Drawdowns
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IALAX drawdown since its inception was -69.30%, which is greater than FSCSX's maximum drawdown of -64.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IALAX and FSCSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IALAX | FSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.30% | -64.66% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.07% | -32.62% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.30% | -37.06% | -32.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.30% | -37.06% | -32.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.66% | -31.99% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -13.18% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.27% | 11.70% | -0.43% |
Volatility
IALAX vs. FSCSX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) at 8.07%. This indicates that IALAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IALAX | FSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 8.07% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 20.01% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 28.30% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.72% | 25.48% | +16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 24.06% | +10.44% |