IALAX vs. MRFOX
IALAX (Transamerica Capital Growth Fund) and MRFOX (Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IALAX returned 14.29%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for MRFOX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IALAX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MRFOX.
Performance
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IALAX achieves a -3.04% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IALAX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 14.29%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.
IALAX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- -1.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
MRFOX
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | -3.04% | 20.54% | 43.92% | 47.30% | -60.39% | 0.10% | 111.63% | 21.63% | 6.59% | 43.81% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 3.03% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IALAX and MRFOX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IALAX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IALAX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
IALAX
MRFOX
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IALAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.20 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.59 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 4.69 | -4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IALAX drawdown since its inception was -69.30%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IALAX and MRFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IALAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.30% | -29.10% | -40.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.07% | -7.03% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.33% | -7.91% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.30% | -12.98% | -56.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.30% | -29.10% | -40.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -2.24% | -18.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -2.35% | -12.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 2.38% | +12.39% |
Volatility
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Capital Growth Fund (IALAX) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 3.85%. This indicates that IALAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IALAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 3.85% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.89% | 7.57% | +16.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.05% | 10.13% | +19.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.93% | 12.14% | +29.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 14.16% | +20.69% |
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IALAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IALAX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
IALAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALAX Transamerica Capital Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.49% | 5.37% | 10.49% | 4.92% | 23.22% | 22.63% | 3.34% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.57% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IALAX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IALAX has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to MRFOX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IALAX dropped -69.30% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.
MRFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IALAX and MRFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer