PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAK vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAK vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.51% return.


IAK

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-4.56%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-4.16%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.66%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAK vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
-4.56%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%25.95%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.51%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IAK and SGOV is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAK vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAK vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAKSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-20.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-275.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

195.55

-194.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

398.20

-398.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

4,462.00

-4,463.14

IAK vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAK Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAK and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAKSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

20.28

-20.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

14.73

-14.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

12.48

-12.23

Drawdowns

IAK vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAKSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.38%

-0.03%

-77.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-0.01%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-0.01%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-0.03%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

0.00%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-0.00%

-16.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

0.00%

+3.96%

Volatility

IAK vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that IAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAKSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

0.05%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

0.13%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

0.20%

+14.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

0.24%

+17.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

0.24%

+20.65%

IAK vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAK vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.76%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAK and SGOV have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAK has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 11.50% vs 3.54% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.76% for IAK.

IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IAK and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAK and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer