IAK vs. RDW
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while RDW (Redwire Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, IAK returned 18.27%/yr vs 79.83%/yr for RDW. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IAK vs. RDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than RDW's 98.95% return.
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
RDW
- 1D
- -11.53%
- 1M
- 31.94%
- YTD
- 98.95%
- 6M
- 107.41%
- 1Y
- -21.74%
- 3Y*
- 79.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAK vs. RDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 3.89% |
RDW Redwire Corporation | 98.95% | -53.83% | 477.54% | 43.94% | -70.67% | -34.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and RDW is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between IAK and RDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. RDW — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
RDW
IAK vs. RDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and Redwire Corporation (RDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAK | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.07 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.29 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | -0.42 | +1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAK vs. RDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, smaller than the maximum RDW drawdown of -87.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and RDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -87.26% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -75.40% | +67.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -80.28% | +68.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -41.62% | +41.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -59.30% | +43.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 51.88% | -48.47% |
Volatility
IAK vs. RDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) is 5.49%, while Redwire Corporation (RDW) has a volatility of 53.68%. This indicates that IAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 53.68% | -48.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 94.49% | -83.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 118.63% | -103.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 96.83% | -78.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 96.83% | -75.91% |
Dividends
IAK vs. RDW - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while RDW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
RDW Redwire Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and RDW have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDW has higher volatility (53.68%) compared to IAK (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs RDW's -87.26%.
IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and RDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer