IAK vs. HSBH
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) and HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IAK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index while HSBH tracks the HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IAK returned 7.11% vs 71.13% for HSBH. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAK charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for HSBH.
Performance
IAK vs. HSBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than HSBH's 26.93% return.
IAK
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
HSBH
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 26.93%
- 6M
- 26.23%
- 1Y
- 71.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAK vs. HSBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 3.98% | 5.71% |
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 26.93% | 39.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and HSBH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.20 |
IAK vs. HSBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAK
HSBH
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAK
HSBH
Healthcare
IAK
HSBH
-
Basic Materials
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Communication Services
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Consumer Defensive
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Energy
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Industrials
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Real Estate
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Technology
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Utilities
IAK
-
HSBH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. HSBH — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
HSBH
IAK vs. HSBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAK | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.52 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 4.83 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 17.50 | -15.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAK vs. HSBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than HSBH's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and HSBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -14.81% | -62.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -14.81% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -2.33% | -13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 4.08% | -0.67% |
Volatility
IAK vs. HSBH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) is 5.61%, while HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that IAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 8.22% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 19.28% | -8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 23.64% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 22.88% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.88% | -2.01% |
IAK vs. HSBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAK has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HSBH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAK vs. HSBH - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than HSBH's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.57% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and HSBH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSBH has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to IAK (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs HSBH's -14.81%.
On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 71.13% vs 7.11% for IAK. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 71.13% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.34% for HSBH.
IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while HSBH tracks HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IAK and 0.19% for HSBH.
HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and HSBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer