PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAI vs. UYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAI vs. UYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAI achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IAI has outperformed UYM with an annualized return of 19.37%, while UYM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.


IAI

1D
1.83%
1M
2.57%
YTD
3.17%
6M
2.78%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
19.37%

UYM

1D
3.74%
1M
1.10%
YTD
27.95%
6M
30.38%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAI vs. UYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAI
iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF
3.17%25.80%34.37%15.27%-10.87%40.48%18.61%24.26%-9.47%28.86%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
27.95%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%54.58%16.56%35.09%-35.68%51.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IAI and UYM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IAI and UYM has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IAI vs. UYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAI
UYM

Financial Services

99.9%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

87.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IAI
99.9%
UYM

-

Technology

IAI
0.1%
UYM

-

Basic Materials

IAI

-

UYM
87.6%

Communication Services

IAI

-

UYM

-

Consumer Cyclical

IAI

-

UYM
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

IAI

-

UYM

-

Energy

IAI

-

UYM

-

Healthcare

IAI

-

UYM

-

Industrials

IAI

-

UYM
1.1%

Real Estate

IAI

-

UYM

-

Utilities

IAI

-

UYM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAI vs. UYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAI
IAI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAI vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAIUYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

3.67

-0.34

IAI vs. UYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the UYM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAI and UYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAI vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAI drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAI and UYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAIUYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.46%

-92.77%

+17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.52%

-23.85%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-43.88%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.84%

-48.25%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.38%

-73.31%

+32.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-7.32%

+4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.63%

-42.06%

+19.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

8.95%

-3.15%

Volatility

IAI vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) is 5.98%, while ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that IAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAIUYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

14.01%

-8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

27.29%

-11.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.44%

35.09%

-15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

39.49%

-18.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

42.86%

-20.01%

IAI vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAI has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than UYM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAI vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison

IAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than UYM's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAI
iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF
1.05%0.95%1.05%1.80%2.14%1.31%1.55%1.52%1.58%1.37%1.49%1.31%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.19%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAI and UYM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to IAI (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAI dropped -75.46% vs UYM's -92.77%.

On 10-year performance, IAI leads with 19.37% vs 12.48% for UYM. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAI has performed better with a 19.37% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAI is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYM.

UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.05% for IAI.

IAI is categorized as Financials Equities, while UYM is Leveraged Equities. IAI tracks DJ US Select / Investment Services, while UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IAI and 0.95% for UYM.

IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAI and UYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer