IAI vs. IYH
IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAI is a Financials Equities fund tracking the DJ US Select / Investment Services, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAI returned 19.37%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAI charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
IAI vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAI achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IAI has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 19.37%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
IAI
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 28.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IAI vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 3.17% | 25.80% | 34.37% | 15.27% | -10.87% | 40.48% | 18.61% | 24.26% | -9.47% | 28.86% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAI and IYH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAI and IYH has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAI vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAI
IYH
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAI
IYH
-
Technology
IAI
IYH
-
Basic Materials
IAI
-
IYH
-
Communication Services
IAI
-
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAI
-
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
IAI
-
IYH
-
Energy
IAI
-
IYH
-
Healthcare
IAI
-
IYH
Industrials
IAI
-
IYH
-
Real Estate
IAI
-
IYH
-
Utilities
IAI
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAI vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
IAI
IYH
IAI vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAI | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 3.18 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAI vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAI drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAI and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAI | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.46% | -43.12% | -32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.52% | -10.64% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -17.91% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -17.91% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | -28.40% | -11.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -3.94% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -8.96% | -13.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 4.46% | +1.34% |
Volatility
IAI vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.94%. This indicates that IAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAI | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.94% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 10.64% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 15.10% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 14.96% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 16.74% | +6.11% |
IAI vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAI has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAI vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
IAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than IYH's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 1.05% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.80% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.31% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAI and IYH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAI has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAI dropped -75.46% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, IAI leads with 19.37% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAI has performed better with a 19.37% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAI is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.05% for IAI.
IAI is categorized as Financials Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. IAI tracks DJ US Select / Investment Services, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IAI and 0.43% for IYH.
IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAI and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer