IAGG vs. IBIT
IAGG (iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAGG is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IAGG returned 2.30% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAGG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IAGG vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IAGG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAGG vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.92% | 3.26% | 5.06% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and IBIT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAGG vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IAGG
IBIT
IAGG vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAGG | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.86 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.79 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | -1.36 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAGG | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.89 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.30 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAGG | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -49.36% | +35.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -49.36% | +47.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -48.10% | +47.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -16.02% | +13.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 28.44% | -27.67% |
Volatility
IAGG vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) is 1.18%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAGG | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 9.50% | -8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 34.44% | -32.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 43.73% | -40.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 50.19% | -45.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 50.19% | -46.14% |
IAGG vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAGG vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.66% | 3.08% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.27% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAGG and IBIT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IAGG (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAGG dropped -13.88% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IAGG leads with 2.30% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IAGG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAGG has performed better with a 2.30% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAGG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IAGG is categorized as Global Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IAGG tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IAGG and 0.25% for IBIT.
IAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAGG and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer