IAGG vs. IBND
IAGG (iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF) and IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAGG is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while IBND is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAGG returned 2.02%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for IBND. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAGG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBND.
Performance
IAGG vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IAGG has outperformed IBND with an annualized return of 2.02%, while IBND has yielded a comparatively lower 0.66% annualized return.
IAGG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
IBND
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- -0.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- 0.66%
IAGG vs. IBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.39% | 3.26% | 4.51% | 8.49% | -10.86% | -1.87% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 3.38% | 2.09% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | -2.08% | 16.17% | -2.81% | 10.38% | -19.44% | -8.40% | 11.50% | 4.41% | -6.15% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and IBND is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2015 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, IAGG and IBND have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAGG vs. IBND — Risk / Return Rank
IAGG
IBND
IAGG vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAGG | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.16 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | -0.38 | +3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and IBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAGG | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -35.62% | +21.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -6.75% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.32% | -9.18% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | -33.49% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.88% | -35.62% | +21.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -10.37% | +9.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -10.63% | +7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 2.83% | -2.04% |
Volatility
IAGG vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) is 0.82%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that IAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAGG | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 2.03% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 6.35% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 7.99% | -5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 9.75% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 8.92% | -4.88% |
IAGG vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAGG vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than IBND's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 3.08% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.27% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.79% | 2.49% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAGG and IBND have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBND has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to IAGG (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAGG dropped -13.88% vs IBND's -35.62%.
On 10-year performance, IAGG leads with 2.02% vs 0.66% for IBND. On fees, IAGG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IAGG has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAGG has performed better with a 2.02% return vs 0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAGG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.
IAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.79% for IBND.
IAGG is categorized as Global Bonds, while IBND is Corporate Bonds. IAGG tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IAGG and 0.50% for IBND.
IAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAGG and IBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer