IAGG vs. IBND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND).
IAGG and IBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2015. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both IAGG and IBND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IAGG or IBND.
Key characteristics
| IAGG | IBND | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.01% | -1.24% |
| 1Y Return | 7.94% | 4.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.20% | -4.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.63% | -1.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.20 | 0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.37 | 0.98 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.12 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.97 | 0.22 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.05 | 1.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.70% | 3.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.83% | 7.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.88% | -35.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.30% | -19.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and IBND is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IAGG vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -1.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAGG vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IAGG vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IAGG vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than IBND's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.42% | 3.55% | 2.28% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.70% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 1.66% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and IBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IAGG vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) is 1.01%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that IAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.