PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG vs. ZVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG vs. ZVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ZVRA's 41.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has outperformed ZVRA with an annualized return of 16.20%, while ZVRA has yielded a comparatively lower -16.40% annualized return.


IAG

1D
3.16%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
0.97%
6M
5.11%
1Y
120.82%
3Y*
80.32%
5Y*
35.17%
10Y*
16.20%

ZVRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
13.76%
YTD
41.18%
6M
51.86%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
-16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAG vs. ZVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.97%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
41.18%7.43%27.33%42.70%-47.30%-22.23%84.70%-78.71%-56.05%37.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and ZVRA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG:

$9.89B

ZVRA:

$761.92M

EPS

IAG:

$1.73

ZVRA:

$2.16

PE Ratio

IAG:

9.63

ZVRA:

5.85

PS Ratio

IAG:

2.84

ZVRA:

5.94

PB Ratio

IAG:

2.28

ZVRA:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG:

$3.42B

ZVRA:

$122.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG:

$1.64B

ZVRA:

$104.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG:

$1.97B

ZVRA:

$149.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG vs. ZVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVRA
ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. ZVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAGZVRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

0.81

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

1.41

+6.27

IAG vs. ZVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the ZVRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and ZVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAG vs. ZVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, roughly equal to the maximum ZVRA drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and ZVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAGZVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.55%

-99.27%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.60%

-43.47%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.60%

-43.47%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

-74.01%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

-97.85%

+11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.23%

-96.65%

+64.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-86.41%

+30.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

24.87%

-9.07%

Volatility

IAG vs. ZVRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is 20.86%, while Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a volatility of 24.56%. This indicates that IAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAGZVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.86%

24.56%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.19%

40.23%

+8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.99%

62.90%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.55%

60.49%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.65%

81.46%

-22.81%

Dividends

IAG vs. ZVRA - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor ZVRA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IAG vs. ZVRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and Zevra Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.03B
36.22M
(IAG) Total Revenue
(ZVRA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IAG and ZVRA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVRA has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to IAG (20.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAG dropped -95.55% vs ZVRA's -99.27%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG and ZVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer