PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG vs. TFPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG vs. TFPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than TFPM's -13.03% return.


IAG

1D
-4.32%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-8.64%
1Y
112.06%
3Y*
84.41%
5Y*
39.43%
10Y*
14.25%

TFPM

1D
-3.55%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
-13.03%
6M
-17.02%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAG vs. TFPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-1.88%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%40.99%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-13.03%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%32.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and TFPM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, IAG and TFPM have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG:

$9.61B

TFPM:

$5.97B

EPS

IAG:

$1.73

TFPM:

$1.51

PE Ratio

IAG:

9.35

TFPM:

19.04

PEG Ratio

IAG:

0.05

TFPM:

0.15

PS Ratio

IAG:

2.76

TFPM:

13.07

PB Ratio

IAG:

2.22

TFPM:

2.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG:

$3.42B

TFPM:

$453.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG:

$1.64B

TFPM:

$337.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG:

$1.97B

TFPM:

$354.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG vs. TFPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. TFPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAGTFPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.47

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

1.27

+5.59

IAG vs. TFPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the TFPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and TFPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAG vs. TFPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than TFPM's maximum drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and TFPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAGTFPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.55%

-36.48%

-59.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.60%

-34.87%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.60%

-34.87%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.15%

-30.14%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.16%

-13.49%

-42.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.45%

12.82%

+3.63%

Volatility

IAG vs. TFPM - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 20.88% compared to Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) at 15.57%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAGTFPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.88%

15.57%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.09%

34.92%

+15.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.60%

43.97%

+18.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.60%

37.51%

+23.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.66%

37.51%

+21.15%

Dividends

IAG vs. TFPM - Dividend Comparison

IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.80%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%

Financials

IAG vs. TFPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.03B
144.96M
(IAG) Total Revenue
(TFPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IAG vs. TFPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
55.4%
72.0%
Portfolio components
IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

TFPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

TFPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.

TFPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAG and TFPM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAG has higher volatility (20.88%) compared to TFPM (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAG dropped -95.55% vs TFPM's -36.48%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG and TFPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer