PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG vs. FSLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a -7.10% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's -12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 12.59%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.10% annualized return.


IAG

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.08%
6M
-10.98%
YTD
-7.10%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
78.58%
5Y*
39.12%
10Y*
12.59%

FSLR

1D
-0.29%
1M
-15.98%
6M
-4.54%
YTD
-12.79%
1Y
40.25%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
19.74%
10Y*
17.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAG vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-7.10%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
-12.79%48.22%2.30%15.01%71.86%-11.89%76.77%31.81%-37.12%110.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and FSLR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.17

The correlation between IAG and FSLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG:

$8.85B

FSLR:

$24.48B

EPS

IAG:

$1.73

FSLR:

$15.48

PE Ratio

IAG:

8.87

FSLR:

14.72

PEG Ratio

IAG:

0.05

FSLR:

0.35

PS Ratio

IAG:

2.62

FSLR:

4.52

PB Ratio

IAG:

2.10

FSLR:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG:

$3.42B

FSLR:

$5.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG:

$1.64B

FSLR:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG:

$1.97B

FSLR:

$2.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLR
FSLR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAGFSLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.09

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

2.17

+4.51

IAG vs. FSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and FSLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAG vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and FSLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAGFSLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.55%

-96.22%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.60%

-35.10%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.60%

-59.97%

+20.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

-59.97%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

-61.26%

-25.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.65%

-28.41%

-9.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-63.05%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.10%

17.53%

+0.57%

Volatility

IAG vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 18.59% compared to First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) at 15.11%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAGFSLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.59%

15.11%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.34%

39.86%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.39%

54.00%

+8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.72%

54.12%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.63%

50.78%

+7.85%

Dividends

IAG vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor FSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IAG vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.03B
1.04B
(IAG) Total Revenue
(FSLR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IAG vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and First Solar, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.4%
46.6%
Portfolio components
IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

FSLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.13M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

FSLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.30M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.

FSLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 346.62M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAG and FSLR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAG has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to FSLR (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAG dropped -95.55% vs FSLR's -96.22%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG and FSLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer