PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG.L vs. AGI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAG.L is traded in GBp, while AGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AGI.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG.L achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly higher than AGI.TO's -8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG.L has underperformed AGI.TO with an annualized return of 12.33%, while AGI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


IAG.L

1D
7.07%
1M
13.48%
YTD
5.29%
6M
8.05%
1Y
41.42%
3Y*
39.82%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
12.33%

AGI.TO

1D
2.10%
1M
-19.01%
YTD
-8.38%
6M
-8.52%
1Y
29.96%
3Y*
39.74%
5Y*
34.19%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
5.29%40.91%97.04%25.16%-13.08%-10.84%-41.84%20.62%2.06%56.82%
AGI.TO
Alamos Gold Inc.
-8.38%95.15%40.44%27.72%49.80%-10.73%42.56%60.86%-41.24%-13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG.L and AGI.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

-0.02

The correlation between IAG.L and AGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (10 years) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG.L:

£21.74B

AGI.TO:

CA$20.75B

EPS

IAG.L:

€0.98

AGI.TO:

$2.52

PE Ratio

IAG.L:

5.14

AGI.TO:

13.99

PEG Ratio

IAG.L:

0.04

AGI.TO:

0.09

PS Ratio

IAG.L:

0.57

AGI.TO:

7.19

PB Ratio

IAG.L:

3.31

AGI.TO:

3.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG.L:

€42.52B

AGI.TO:

$2.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG.L:

€9.71B

AGI.TO:

$1.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG.L:

€8.77B

AGI.TO:

$1.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG.L
IAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AGI.TO
AGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAG.LAGI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.14

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.77

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

2.24

+1.52

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the AGI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG.L and AGI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG.L drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, smaller than the maximum AGI.TO drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG.L and AGI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAG.LAGI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.97%

-86.96%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-40.30%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.74%

-40.30%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.24%

-40.30%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.58%

-70.30%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-36.26%

+31.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.38%

-36.05%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.60%

13.87%

-4.27%

Volatility

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) is 11.36%, while Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a volatility of 16.82%. This indicates that IAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAG.LAGI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

16.82%

-5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.94%

40.26%

-11.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.59%

49.32%

-12.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.08%

38.01%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.42%

46.53%

+1.89%

Dividends

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Dividend Comparison

IAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than AGI.TO's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGI.TO
Alamos Gold Inc.
0.37%0.26%0.52%0.76%0.91%1.03%0.79%0.51%0.41%0.29%0.22%0.88%
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
2.16%2.27%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.57%7.50%5.65%6.92%2.28%

Financials

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
17.28B
586.92M
(IAG.L) Total Revenue
(AGI.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IAG.L values in EUR, AGI.TO values in USD

IAG.L vs. AGI.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A and Alamos Gold Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
24.0%
63.9%
Portfolio components
IAG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 17.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

AGI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.

IAG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

AGI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.

IAG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 17.28B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

AGI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAG.L and AGI.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG.L and AGI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer