PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares AEX UCITS ETF (IAEX.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAEX.AS is traded in EUR, while R1GR.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the R1GR.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAEX.AS achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's 7.67% return.


IAEX.AS

1D
0.32%
1M
3.90%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.74%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
11.40%

R1GR.AS

1D
-0.31%
1M
5.93%
YTD
7.67%
6M
6.91%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IAEX.AS
iShares AEX UCITS ETF
11.70%10.37%14.23%0.27%
R1GR.AS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF
7.67%3.62%43.99%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023

0.51

The correlation between IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAEX.AS
IAEX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IAEX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAEX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAEX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAEX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAEX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

R1GR.AS
R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AEX UCITS ETF (IAEX.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAEX.ASR1GR.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.56

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

4.39

+1.22

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAEX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAEX.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.15

-0.84

Drawdowns

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAEX.AS drawdown since its inception was -64.96%, which is greater than R1GR.AS's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAEX.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.96%

-27.06%

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.78%

-14.67%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.39%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-4.95%

-12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

5.26%

-2.47%

Volatility

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AEX UCITS ETF (IAEX.AS) is 3.84%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that IAEX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAEX.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.11%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

11.20%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

15.90%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.57%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

19.57%

-3.35%

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAEX.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAEX.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison

IAEX.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while R1GR.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAEX.AS
iShares AEX UCITS ETF
1.84%2.07%2.13%2.12%2.28%1.54%1.23%2.79%3.15%2.74%2.86%2.90%
R1GR.AS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IAEX.AS.

IAEX.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while R1GR.AS is Large Cap Growth Equities. IAEX.AS tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR, while R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IAEX.AS and 0.18% for R1GR.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAEX.AS and R1GR.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer