IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS
IAEX.AS (iShares AEX UCITS ETF) and CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAEX.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR, while CNDX.AS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAEX.AS returned 11.39%/yr vs 21.38%/yr for CNDX.AS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAEX.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNDX.AS.
Performance
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAEX.AS achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IAEX.AS has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 11.39%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.
IAEX.AS
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 15.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 21.89%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 38.95%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 18.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.38%
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAEX.AS iShares AEX UCITS ETF | 11.34% | 10.37% | 14.23% | 16.75% | -12.11% | 30.21% | 4.78% | 27.67% | -8.03% | 15.97% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 21.89% | 6.16% | 35.29% | 50.41% | -29.90% | 38.80% | 35.83% | 40.51% | 4.53% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAEX.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IAEX.AS and CNDX.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IAEX.AS
CNDX.AS
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AEX UCITS ETF (IAEX.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAEX.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.44 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.82 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 11.35 | -5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAEX.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.49 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.94 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.07 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.03 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAEX.AS drawdown since its inception was -64.96%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAEX.AS and CNDX.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAEX.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.96% | -31.21% | -33.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -10.06% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.83% | -26.57% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -31.21% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.49% | -31.21% | -4.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -5.45% | -11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.40% | -0.61% |
Volatility
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares AEX UCITS ETF (IAEX.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAEX.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.25% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 10.70% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 15.52% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 19.73% | -4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 19.61% | -3.39% |
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAEX.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAEX.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
IAEX.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAEX.AS iShares AEX UCITS ETF | 1.84% | 2.07% | 2.13% | 2.12% | 2.28% | 1.54% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 3.15% | 2.74% | 2.86% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAEX.AS and CNDX.AS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAEX.AS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAEX.AS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
IAEX.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNDX.AS is Nasdaq-100. IAEX.AS tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR, while CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IAEX.AS and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Find the right allocation for IAEX.AS and CNDX.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer