IAE vs. IIRLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund (IAE) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX).
IAE is managed by Voya. It was launched on Mar 27, 2007. IIRLX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Mar 10, 2008.
Performance
IAE vs. IIRLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAE vs. IIRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAE Voya Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund | 2.87% | 35.90% | 14.60% | 9.06% | -13.97% | 3.60% | 13.77% | 9.62% | -11.31% | 30.19% |
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | -8.38% | 18.77% | 26.95% | 29.41% | -20.07% | 27.26% | 21.71% | 31.18% | -3.45% | 22.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than IIRLX's -8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IAE has underperformed IIRLX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while IIRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return.
IAE
- 1D
- 4.10%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
IIRLX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAE vs. IIRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAE has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IIRLX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IAE vs. IIRLX — Risk / Return Rank
IAE
IIRLX
IAE vs. IIRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund (IAE) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAE | IIRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 0.74 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.26 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.22 | +2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 0.81 | +7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAE | IIRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 0.74 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.78 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.56 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAE and IIRLX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IAE vs. IIRLX - Dividend Comparison
IAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, more than IIRLX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAE Voya Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund | 11.47% | 11.61% | 13.37% | 10.65% | 14.03% | 10.60% | 9.97% | 9.88% | 9.61% | 7.82% | 11.14% | 12.74% |
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | 4.11% | 3.76% | 0.96% | 1.14% | 5.04% | 4.77% | 4.71% | 4.35% | 1.73% | 1.47% | 1.77% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
IAE vs. IIRLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAE drawdown since its inception was -60.72%, which is greater than IIRLX's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAE and IIRLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAE | IIRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.72% | -50.33% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -11.99% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -25.83% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.44% | -32.60% | -9.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.29% | -9.83% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -6.83% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 5.36% | -1.34% |
Volatility
IAE vs. IIRLX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund (IAE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) at 4.31%. This indicates that IAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAE | IIRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 4.31% | +5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 9.23% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 19.71% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.56% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 18.39% | +0.88% |