PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAAA.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than GLAG.L's 0.02% return.


IAAA.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.13%
6M
1.27%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
-3.01%
10Y*
-0.36%

GLAG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
0.13%10.70%-5.21%8.69%-21.12%-8.15%12.09%4.75%-4.30%
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.02%7.79%-1.43%5.30%-16.03%-5.16%9.05%5.87%-3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IAAA.L and GLAG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.65

The correlation between IAAA.L and GLAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAAA.L
IAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAG.L
GLAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAAA.LGLAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

0.65

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

1.80

+0.10

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAAA.L and GLAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAAA.LGLAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

-0.27

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

-0.01

-0.06

Drawdowns

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, which is greater than GLAG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAA.L and GLAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAAA.LGLAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

-25.75%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-3.53%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.21%

-6.86%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.57%

-24.25%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.30%

-10.98%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-9.75%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.28%

+0.70%

Volatility

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) at 1.98%. This indicates that IAAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAAA.LGLAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.98%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

3.82%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

4.96%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

6.50%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.36%

5.79%

+3.57%

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAAA.L vs. GLAG.L - Dividend Comparison

IAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than GLAG.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
3.15%3.00%2.80%2.02%1.48%1.24%1.47%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
2.69%2.46%2.37%1.52%0.76%0.49%0.56%0.88%0.94%0.77%0.89%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAAA.L and GLAG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IAAA.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IAAA.L and 0.10% for GLAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAAA.L and GLAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer