PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HZEN vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HZEN achieves a -35.16% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -14.12% return.


HZEN

1D
7.64%
1M
-14.57%
YTD
-35.16%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-6.95%
3Y*
-15.44%
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
3.05%
1M
-27.73%
YTD
-14.12%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
658.64%
3Y*
116.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HZEN
Grayscale Horizen Trust
-35.16%-83.06%164.86%236.36%-93.12%-73.33%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
-14.12%446.78%96.92%65.91%-86.30%-48.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HZEN and ZCSH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.39

The correlation between HZEN and ZCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HZEN vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HZEN
HZEN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HZEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HZEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HZEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HZEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HZEN Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HZENZCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.42

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

9.55

-9.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

17.82

-17.94

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HZEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ZCSH Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HZEN and ZCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HZEN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than ZCSH's maximum drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HZEN and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HZENZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-93.73%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.69%

-69.62%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.24%

-71.90%

-22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.21%

-48.78%

-49.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.97%

-73.93%

-18.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.39%

37.24%

+19.15%

Volatility

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) is 37.94%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 63.24%. This indicates that HZEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HZENZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.94%

63.24%

-25.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.48%

106.64%

-28.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.07%

174.09%

-35.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.03%

138.14%

+11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.03%

138.14%

+11.89%

Dividends

HZEN vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither HZEN nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HZEN and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZCSH has higher volatility (63.24%) compared to HZEN (37.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HZEN dropped -98.73% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.

On 3-year performance, ZCSH leads with 116.79% vs -15.44% for HZEN. On volatility, HZEN has been the lower-risk option at 37.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 116.79% return vs -15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HZEN and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HZEN and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer