HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L
HYUS.L (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IDAP.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - HYUS.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while IDAP.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYUS.L returned 8.87%/yr vs 21.67%/yr for IDAP.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IDAP.L.
Performance
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYUS.L achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than IDAP.L's 12.85% return.
HYUS.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDAP.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 38.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYUS.L iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.22% | 8.62% | 8.28% | 12.85% | -5.88% |
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 12.85% | 29.69% | 6.18% | 13.48% | -4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYUS.L and IDAP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between HYUS.L and IDAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYUS.L
IDAP.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HYUS.L
IDAP.L
Basic Materials
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Communication Services
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Consumer Cyclical
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Consumer Defensive
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Energy
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Financial Services
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Healthcare
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Industrials
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Technology
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Utilities
HYUS.L
-
IDAP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYUS.L
IDAP.L
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYUS.L | IDAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 4.34 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 16.72 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYUS.L | IDAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.95 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.24 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYUS.L drawdown since its inception was -10.49%, smaller than the maximum IDAP.L drawdown of -69.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUS.L and IDAP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYUS.L | IDAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -69.37% | +58.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -8.77% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.06% | -18.62% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -3.01% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -11.15% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.28% | -1.72% |
Volatility
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L) is 1.39%, while iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that HYUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYUS.L | IDAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 4.29% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 10.41% | -7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 12.92% | -9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 14.81% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 16.73% | -10.04% |
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IDAP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYUS.L vs. IDAP.L - Dividend Comparison
HYUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than IDAP.L's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYUS.L iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.21% | 7.38% | 7.54% | 6.30% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 3.65% | 4.22% | 5.36% | 5.72% | 6.92% | 5.59% | 3.49% | 5.52% | 6.04% | 4.55% | 4.54% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYUS.L and IDAP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDAP.L.
HYUS.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IDAP.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HYUS.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while IDAP.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUS.L and 0.59% for IDAP.L.
Find the right allocation for HYUS.L and IDAP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer