HYUP vs. FLRT
HYUP (Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYUP is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYUP returned 4.39%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYUP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
HYUP vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.83% return.
HYUP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
HYUP vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.63% | 8.83% | 10.30% | 14.56% | -13.30% | 5.13% | 5.73% | 16.54% | -3.90% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.83% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYUP and FLRT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYUP vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
HYUP
FLRT
HYUP vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYUP | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.95 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.43 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 12.62 | -2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYUP | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 3.89 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 2.61 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.75 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HYUP vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYUP | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.79% | -20.96% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -1.78% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.03% | -2.87% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -7.60% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.15% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -1.41% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.48% | +0.23% |
Volatility
HYUP vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.40%. This indicates that HYUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYUP | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 0.40% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.35% | 1.19% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 1.57% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 2.30% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.75% | 6.17% | +3.58% |
HYUP vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYUP vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than FLRT's 6.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.81% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 7.33% | 7.44% | 7.78% | 7.48% | 7.15% | 6.19% | 6.89% | 6.77% | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYUP and FLRT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYUP has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FLRT (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYUP dropped -24.79% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 5-year performance, FLRT leads with 5.98% vs 4.39% for HYUP. On fees, HYUP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLRT has performed better with a 5.98% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYUP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.
HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 6.81% for FLRT.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUP and 0.69% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYUP and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer