HYTR vs. HEQT
HYTR (CP High Yield Trend ETF) and HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYTR is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the CP High Yield Trend Index, while HEQT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Simplify. HYTR is passively managed, while HEQT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYTR returned 6.52%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for HEQT. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYTR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for HEQT.
Performance
HYTR vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 4.92% return.
HYTR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTR vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | 0.35% | 5.95% | 7.25% | 8.31% | -11.29% | 0.51% |
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 4.92% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 16.61% | -8.25% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYTR and HEQT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between HYTR and HEQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYTR vs. HEQT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYTR
HEQT
Energy
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HYTR
HEQT
Technology
HYTR
HEQT
Real Estate
HYTR
HEQT
Basic Materials
HYTR
-
HEQT
Communication Services
HYTR
-
HEQT
Consumer Cyclical
HYTR
-
HEQT
Consumer Defensive
HYTR
-
HEQT
Financial Services
HYTR
-
HEQT
Healthcare
HYTR
-
HEQT
Industrials
HYTR
-
HEQT
Utilities
HYTR
-
HEQT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYTR vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank
HYTR
HEQT
HYTR vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYTR | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.92 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 13.35 | -5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYTR | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.33 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.08 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
HYTR vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and HEQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYTR | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -11.51% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -5.09% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.93% | -10.57% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.09% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -2.79% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.11% | -0.42% |
Volatility
HYTR vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison
CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 0.73%. This indicates that HYTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYTR | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 0.73% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 5.27% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 6.38% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 8.47% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.86% | 8.47% | -2.61% |
HYTR vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYTR vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison
HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than HEQT's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | 5.70% | 5.78% | 5.55% | 5.43% | 1.24% | 3.70% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYTR and HEQT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYTR has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to HEQT (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs HEQT's -11.51%.
On 3-year performance, HEQT leads with 13.47% vs 6.52% for HYTR. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEQT is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.
HYTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.
HYTR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HEQT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.53% for HEQT.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYTR and HEQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer