PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTI vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTI vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTI achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 80.79% return.


HYTI

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.77%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-2.44%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
80.79%
6M
73.97%
1Y
79.52%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
22.87%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTI vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYTI and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

-0.13

The correlation between HYTI and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTI vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTI vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTIBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.66

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

8.73

+2.60

HYTI vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTI and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTIBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.00

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.13

+1.08

Drawdowns

HYTI vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTI drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTI and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTIBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-87.06%

+82.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-17.87%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-14.85%

+14.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-40.16%

+39.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

9.53%

-8.97%

Volatility

HYTI vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) is 1.27%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that HYTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTIBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

11.71%

-10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

36.33%

-33.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

41.63%

-37.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

35.41%

-30.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

36.69%

-31.46%

HYTI vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTI vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


HYTI and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to HYTI (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTI dropped -4.47% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 79.52% vs 6.41% for HYTI. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 79.52% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

HYTI has the higher dividend yield at 10.46%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

HYTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYTI and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTI and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer