HYT vs. GPIQ
HYT (BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both funds - HYT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYT returned -1.71% vs 30.89% for GPIQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYT charges 2.83%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
HYT vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYT achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 15.39% return.
HYT
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- -1.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYT vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYT BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund | 1.55% | 0.06% | 14.43% | 16.31% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 15.39% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYT and GPIQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYT vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
HYT
GPIQ
HYT vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 3.26 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 13.66 | -14.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYT vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYT drawdown since its inception was -56.95%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYT and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.95% | -21.06% | -35.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -9.51% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -2.76% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -2.27% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.27% | +2.05% |
Volatility
HYT vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) is 2.04%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that HYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 7.69% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.92% | 12.50% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.88% | 15.14% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 17.85% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.85% | -0.92% |
HYT vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYT has a 2.83% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYT vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
HYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than GPIQ's 9.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.56% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYT BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund | 10.94% | 10.50% | 9.53% | 9.91% | 9.80% | 7.58% | 8.18% | 7.92% | 9.20% | 7.68% | 8.23% | 10.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYT and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to HYT (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYT dropped -56.95% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYT and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer