PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSA vs. XTWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSA vs. XTWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than XTWY's -0.10% return.


HYSA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTWY

1D
0.33%
1M
0.64%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSA vs. XTWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and XTWY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSA vs. XTWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XTWY
XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. XTWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSAXTWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.05

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.34

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

0.82

+7.33

HYSA vs. XTWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the XTWY Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and XTWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSAXTWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.28

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

-0.21

+1.58

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. XTWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, smaller than the maximum XTWY drawdown of -25.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and XTWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSAXTWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-25.92%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-9.48%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-15.03%

+14.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-12.24%

+11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.93%

-3.15%

Volatility

HYSA vs. XTWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) is 1.28%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that HYSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSAXTWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

3.42%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

7.71%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

11.72%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

17.62%

-11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

17.62%

-11.54%

HYSA vs. XTWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XTWY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSA vs. XTWY - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than XTWY's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.76%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.68%4.56%4.65%3.86%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSA and XTWY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTWY has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to HYSA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSA dropped -4.90% vs XTWY's -25.92%.

On 1-year performance, HYSA leads with 6.36% vs 3.23% for XTWY. On fees, XTWY is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, HYSA has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYSA has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTWY is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

HYSA has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 4.68% for XTWY.

HYSA is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XTWY is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HYSA and 0.12% for XTWY.

HYSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSA and XTWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer