PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYRM vs. USNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYRM vs. USNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYRM achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than USNZ's 11.68% return.


HYRM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.05%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
10Y*

USNZ

1D
0.03%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.70%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYRM vs. USNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
1.50%5.98%7.81%11.98%2.62%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
11.68%17.76%21.96%27.76%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HYRM and USNZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.67

The correlation between HYRM and USNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYRM vs. USNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYRM
USNZ

Financial Services

92.7%
10.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.4%

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

11.2%

Industrials

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

3.3%

Technology

-

41.9%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

HYRM
92.7%
USNZ
10.5%

Basic Materials

HYRM

-

USNZ
1.3%

Communication Services

HYRM

-

USNZ
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HYRM

-

USNZ
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

HYRM

-

USNZ
3.4%

Energy

HYRM

-

USNZ
0.0%

Healthcare

HYRM

-

USNZ
11.2%

Industrials

HYRM

-

USNZ
3.5%

Real Estate

HYRM

-

USNZ
3.3%

Technology

HYRM

-

USNZ
41.9%

Utilities

HYRM

-

USNZ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYRM vs. USNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYRM
HYRM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYRM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYRM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYRM vs. USNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYRMUSNZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

2.38

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

3.27

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.82

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.29

12.45

+1.84

HYRM vs. USNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the USNZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYRM and USNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYRMUSNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.38

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.23

-0.65

Drawdowns

HYRM vs. USNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYRM drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum USNZ drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYRM and USNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYRMUSNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.42%

-19.16%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-11.07%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.62%

-19.16%

+14.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-3.32%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

2.51%

-1.92%

Volatility

HYRM vs. USNZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) is 1.05%, while Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that HYRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYRMUSNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

3.33%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

10.12%

-6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

13.00%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.87%

16.63%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.87%

16.63%

-8.76%

HYRM vs. USNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYRM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than USNZ's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYRM vs. USNZ - Dividend Comparison

HYRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than USNZ's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
5.92%6.28%6.08%5.78%4.69%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYRM and USNZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USNZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to HYRM (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYRM dropped -12.42% vs USNZ's -19.16%.

On 3-year performance, USNZ leads with 21.52% vs 7.86% for HYRM. On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYRM has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USNZ has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HYRM.

HYRM has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 0.93% for USNZ.

HYRM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while USNZ is Large Cap Blend Equities. HYRM tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies Risk Managed High Yield Index - USD - US Dollar - Benchmark TR Net, while USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HYRM and 0.10% for USNZ.

USNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYRM and USNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer